Re: US Telephone Number Type

From: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: US Telephone Number Type
Date: 2006-07-10 19:46:31
Message-ID: 20060710194631.71485.qmail@web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> > Is the difficulty of creating a telephone type the reason it is not in
> > postgresql already?
> >
> > Should the telephone type be able to do something such as:
> >
> > SELECT * from tableFOO where telephone.areacode = 555;
> >
> > Or would regex be better?
>
> makes more sense to store them in a a canonical format and then find
> things with pattern matches.

Also, due to the problem of keeping area codes segregated in large growing population centers,
there is strong talk about allowing overlapping area codes. Dialing locally will require 11
digits instead of the usual 7.

I know that this is already the case in the state of Georgia and there is talk about adopting it
in California.

Regards,

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2006-07-10 19:52:41 Re: US Telephone Number Type
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-10 19:38:23 Re: US Telephone Number Type