Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Date: 2006-07-10 03:41:17
Message-ID: 200607092041.17766.jd@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday 09 July 2006 20:00, Greg Stark wrote:
> Pursuant to a conversation this evening I would like to a suggestion:
>
> BIRT pgsql-patches should be abolished in favour of something else that
> accomplishes the bandwidth-reduction aspect without the downsides.

Alternatively, people could just use patches for patch submission and keep all
discussion on hackers.

Joshua D. Drake

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-07-10 04:04:09 Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-07-10 03:31:04 Re: row() is [not] null infelicities