Re: Why my cursor construction is so slow?

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "biuro(at)globeinphotos(dot)com" <biuro(at)globeinphotos(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why my cursor construction is so slow?
Date: 2006-07-07 11:17:20
Message-ID: 20060707111720.GC7485@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:30:35AM +0000, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > With the LIMIT it might take a different approach, which
> > might be worse if you read the whole lot, but better for a limited set.
> > A fast-start plan so to speak.
>
> That looks like a better approach for a cursor.

For a cursor postgres assumes you're going to ask for about 10% of the
result, so it does aim for a reasonably fast-start plan. It probably
depends on the specifics of the situation how well it works...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2006-07-07 11:18:10 Re: Long term database archival
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-07-07 10:37:49 Re: WAL internals