From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | Tomasz Ostrowski <tometzky(at)batory(dot)org(dot)pl> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: query very slow when enable_seqscan=on |
Date: | 2006-07-04 16:24:34 |
Message-ID: | 20060704162434.GD20619@www.trapp.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Tomasz Ostrowski wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I think the real problem here is that regex matching is the wrong
> > tool for the job. Have you looked into a full-text index
> > (tsearch2)?
>
> So much to do with so little time...
For what it's worth, I've got pretty good results (at least taking the
little amount of work I put into it) with trigram indexes, courtesy of
$PGCONTRIB/pg_trgm.sql, just another amazing little piece by Bartunov
and Sigaev.
Let me know if you'd like to hear more.
Regards
-- tomás
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tommaso gastaldi | 2006-07-04 17:00:18 | BUG #2513: What? OleDbSchemaGuids not supported ?!!! This is CRUCIAL! |
Previous Message | Tomasz Ostrowski | 2006-07-04 14:44:08 | Re: query very slow when enable_seqscan=on |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-04 18:15:54 | Re: query very slow when enable_seqscan=on |
Previous Message | Nolan Cafferky | 2006-07-04 16:18:43 | Re: how to tune this query. |