From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dragan Matic <mlists(at)panforma(dot)co(dot)yu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: different sort order in windows and linux version |
Date: | 2006-07-03 12:15:44 |
Message-ID: | 20060703121544.GA24524@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:55:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fine for you, not so fine for other people with different concerns.
>
> I'm not unsympathetic to your general point, but black-and-white
> arguments won't get far in this discussion. It's all about tradeoffs
> ... it's most definitely not about one-size-fits-all.
What I find most confusing is that the patch for adding ICU to postgres
(using a configure switch) has been around for a while, at one point it
was even in the queue for 8.2:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00309.php
It's vanished from there, not sure why. Even so, we still get regular
requests for it. Presumably it was removed here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00233.php
Given the patch does nothing if you don't enable it, I'm not quite sure
what the downsides would be...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Zolotukhin | 2006-07-03 13:03:28 | Re: PostgreSQL and OpenVZ |
Previous Message | Dragan Matic | 2006-07-03 11:58:34 | Re: different sort order in windows and linux version |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sven Geisler | 2006-07-03 12:41:39 | Re: patch postgresql for AMD64 (Opteron) |
Previous Message | Dragan Matic | 2006-07-03 11:58:34 | Re: different sort order in windows and linux version |