Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint

From: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Aaron Bono <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, General Postgresql List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint
Date: 2006-07-03 01:52:26
Message-ID: 20060703015226.30511.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> This is more of an implementation option, but when I worry about what is
> active/inactive I put start/end dates on the tables. Then you don't need
> active indicators. You just look for the record where now() is >= start
> date and now() <= end date or end date is null. You can even
> activate/deactivate a badge on a future date. Of course, this complicates
> the data integrity - you will need some kind of specialized trigger that
> checks the data and makes sure there are no date overlaps to ensure you
> don't have two badges active at the same time. But is also gives you a
> history of badges and their activities.

Good point. I take it that this type of solution stems from temporal schema design.

Regards,

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phillip Smith 2006-07-03 02:16:04 Re: join two tables with sharing some columns between two
Previous Message Richard Broersma Jr 2006-07-03 01:50:25 Re: Alternative to Select in table check constraint