From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Brent Wilkins <wilkins(at)cs(dot)colostate(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS |
Date: | 2006-06-29 15:20:35 |
Message-ID: | 200606291120.36254.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 16:20, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Marc,
>
> > The one that I can try and answer is the Developer Team Size, which
> > is a # that is very hard to arrive at .. the 'clearly defined
> > developers' are all listed at:
>
> I stick with Greg's estimate of "about 200" that he did for 7.4. That
> included:
>
> core contributors
> minor patch submitters
> beta testers (the ones who submitted bug fixes)
> key contributors to closely associated projects (like JDBC, ODBC, and
> OpenFTS)
>
> It was a lot of research on his part which is why I don't want to do it
> again.
I wonder if that number would need to be bumped up in a rather handwavy manner
(amybe +50) on the grounds of companies like enterprisedb, fujitsu,
greenplum, and sun, which I would guess have developers working behind the
scenes on issues thier companies care most about, which then get filtered up
through a few individuals to the community at large. Additionally we also
have more "closely tied" projects like slony and npgsql to draw in more
people. Thoughts?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-06-29 18:24:23 | Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-06-28 20:26:39 | Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS |