Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as
Date: 2006-06-28 18:12:17
Message-ID: 20060628181217.GM44573@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:49:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Personally I don't buy the misuse objection - we already have plenty of
> things that can be misused. As long as there is a reasonable valid use
> and we can make it portable enough, I think there is a good case for
> including it.

Well, since Mark has one, how about we consider adding it in?

If nothing else, can you please put your stuff on pgFoundry so others
can find it, Mark?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad Nicholson 2006-06-28 18:48:01 Strange Behavior with Serializable Transcations
Previous Message Bill Eaton 2006-06-28 18:09:34 Re: unusual "relation xxx does not exist" problem

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-28 18:16:29 Single Index Tuple Chain (SITC) method
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-28 17:59:32 Re: Instability in TRUNCATE regression test