Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It'd be interesting to compare 8.1 and HEAD for the no-overhead case;
> >> I don't think you need to redo all four cases, but I'd like to see that one.
>
> > 8.1: 50,50,49
> > HEAD: 49,48,49
>
> OK, so that seems comparable to my results on a dual Xeon ... probably,
> both your machine and my newer one have fast-to-read clock hardware.
> We need to get some numbers from one of the people who have complained
> about EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead.

I'm compiling here without the assert stuff. It takes a while ...

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.