From: | Ash Grove <ash_grv7(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: concurrency problem |
Date: | 2006-06-16 14:08:55 |
Message-ID: | 20060616140855.72700.qmail@web52513.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
>INSERT INTO rcp_patient_visit_monitor (
> entry_no, patient_id, visit_date,
> is_newpatient,
> visit_type, is_medical,
> is_review, is_labtest, is_scan,
> is_scopy, is_xray,
> weight, height)
> VALUES ((SELECT
> coalesce(max(entry_no)+1, 1) FROM
>
rcp_patient_visit_monitor),?,current_timestamp,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)
You are only working on one table so you sholdn't have
to manage a transaction or deal with explicit locking.
Just let the database handle this for you with a
sequence. Your concurrency issues will disappear.
1) create a sequence:
create sequence entry_no_sequence
2) set the new sequence's value to your table's
current entry_no value (n):
select setval('entry_no_sequence',n)
3) recreate your table so that the entry_no will get
it's value from calling nextval() on your new
sequence:
entry_no integer not null default
nextval('entry_no_sequence')
Thereafter, when an insert is made on your table, the
enry_no field will get its value from the sequence and
the sequence will be incremented. You would then drop
entro_no from your insert statement and it would
become something like:
INSERT INTO rcp_patient_visit_monitor (
patient_id, visit_date, is_newpatient, visit_type,
is_medical, is_review,
is_labtest, is_scan, is_scopy, is_xray, weight,
height)
VALUES (?,current_timestamp,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-16 14:26:17 | Re: Repetitive code |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2006-06-16 14:08:00 | Re: Repetitive code |