Re: table has a many to many relationship with itself ... ?

From: Wayne Conrad <wconrad(at)yagni(dot)com>
To: Daniel McBrearty <danielmcbrearty(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table has a many to many relationship with itself ... ?
Date: 2006-06-16 05:33:24
Message-ID: 20060616053324.GA9869@mail.yagni.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:01:01PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> create table translations (
> id serial primary key
> );

> insert into table translations ... insert what?

insert into translations default values;

> The other way to do this that I see is to lose the link table
> translations_to_phrases, and then make translations
>
> create table translations (
> id serial primary key,
> phrases integer[]
> );
>
> but it seems that I can no longer make postgre aware that the integers
> in translations(phrases) are references.

I wouldn't use an array. I think arrays are best for data that can be
considered one chunk of stuff by postgresql, with the arrayness of
that chunk of stuff only mattering to the application.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message surabhi.ahuja 2006-06-16 06:09:55 Re: B+ versus hash maps
Previous Message snacktime 2006-06-16 05:08:16 minimizing downtime when upgrading