From: | Wayne Conrad <wconrad(at)yagni(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel McBrearty <danielmcbrearty(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: table has a many to many relationship with itself ... ? |
Date: | 2006-06-16 05:33:24 |
Message-ID: | 20060616053324.GA9869@mail.yagni.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:01:01PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> create table translations (
> id serial primary key
> );
> insert into table translations ... insert what?
insert into translations default values;
> The other way to do this that I see is to lose the link table
> translations_to_phrases, and then make translations
>
> create table translations (
> id serial primary key,
> phrases integer[]
> );
>
> but it seems that I can no longer make postgre aware that the integers
> in translations(phrases) are references.
I wouldn't use an array. I think arrays are best for data that can be
considered one chunk of stuff by postgresql, with the arrayness of
that chunk of stuff only mattering to the application.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | surabhi.ahuja | 2006-06-16 06:09:55 | Re: B+ versus hash maps |
Previous Message | snacktime | 2006-06-16 05:08:16 | minimizing downtime when upgrading |