From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: COPY view |
Date: | 2006-06-14 21:19:44 |
Message-ID: | 200606142119.k5ELJiV23663@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>I don't see why views should be special. Tables clearly should be
> >>because we can open them directly.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Ah, I didn't think of that. Good idea. So we don't need this patch?
> >
> >
> >
>
> why do we agree on a patch, implement it and reject it then?
> would be easier to reject it before actually implementing it ...
> it is quite hard to explain to a customer that something is rejected
> after approval - even if things are written properly ...
Agreed. The problem with this patch is that originally we just wanted
views, and later the idea of putting a query in there was agreed on, so
the feature request has changed over time.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-14 21:23:11 | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: SELECT INTO EXACT |
Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-06-14 21:18:53 | Re: timezones to own config file |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-14 21:23:05 | Re: SQL/XML publishing function experimental patch II |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-14 21:18:01 | Re: COPY view |