| From: | Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance Question |
| Date: | 2006-06-14 21:48:44 |
| Message-ID: | 200606141748.44626.terry@esc1.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 03:57 pm, Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com> thus
communicated:
--> Hello List:
-->
--> I've been told that an update to a record is equivalent to a delete and
insert --> operation. We have a utility written in Perl that brings into
sync certain --> elements of 50 thousand records on 8 structurally identical
databases. We --> threw together the script and decided to just delete the
record and re-insert --> it with the data that was brought into sync. Now
the question: Is it just as --> fast to do it this way, or is there some
hidden advantage to performing an --> update?
-->
--> Just curious.
-->
--> TIA
Thanks for the answers. This list is a BIG help to us all :o]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel McBrearty | 2006-06-14 22:14:42 | Re: table has many to many relationship with itself - how |
| Previous Message | SCassidy | 2006-06-14 20:51:50 | Re: table has many to many relationship with itself - how |