Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Date: 2006-06-13 21:17:51
Message-ID: 20060613211751.GC34196@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:44:17PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You can get extremely competitive quotes from IBM or HP as long as you
> say, "You are competing against Dell".

Possibly even more competitive from Sun...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-06-13 21:21:24 Re: scaling up postgres
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-06-13 21:13:47 Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4