From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andy Shellam <andy(at)andycc(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How are ppl monitoring PostgreSQL ... ? What is being |
Date: | 2006-06-10 19:06:53 |
Message-ID: | 20060610190652.GA97248@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 07:29:52PM +0100, Andy Shellam wrote:
> I'm using a great little Linux program called "monit" to check that
> there's something listening on the 5432 port. It also monitors
> individual process memory and CPU usage etc. Quite good.
A server can be quite broken yet still respond to transport- and
network-layer probes like TCP connections and pings. Some NMSs
support custom monitors, so whenever possible I like to do
application-layer tests to ensure that the server not only accepts
connections but is indeed behaving as expected.
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > The subject kinda says it all ... I know there are SNMP patches
> > available out there now, but without those ... ?
MRTG can generate graphs of anything you can write a script to
measure, as long as the script returns output in a certain format.
Other packages of that ilk probably have similar capabilities.
--
Michael Fuhr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-06-10 21:01:28 | Re: How are ppl monitoring PostgreSQL ... ? What is being |
Previous Message | Andy Shellam | 2006-06-10 18:32:46 | Re: Number formatting |