From: | tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too |
Date: | 2006-06-09 19:30:56 |
Message-ID: | 20060609193056.56D989FA5DD@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Log Message:
-----------
Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too unreliable
because node timing is much less predictable than the patch expects. I kept
the API change for InstrStopNode, however.
Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/backend/executor:
execProcnode.c (r1.55 -> r1.56)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c.diff?r1=1.55&r2=1.56)
instrument.c (r1.17 -> r1.18)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/instrument.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18)
pgsql/src/include/executor:
instrument.h (r1.15 -> r1.16)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/executor/instrument.h.diff?r1=1.15&r2=1.16)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-09 19:46:10 | pgsql: Repair remarkably-inefficient query for dumping large object |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-09 18:41:57 | pgsql: Cleanups: < * Allow a database in tablespace t1 with tables |