pgsql: Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too

From: tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too
Date: 2006-06-09 19:30:56
Message-ID: 20060609193056.56D989FA5DD@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Log Message:
-----------
Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too unreliable
because node timing is much less predictable than the patch expects. I kept
the API change for InstrStopNode, however.

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/backend/executor:
execProcnode.c (r1.55 -> r1.56)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c.diff?r1=1.55&r2=1.56)
instrument.c (r1.17 -> r1.18)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/instrument.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18)
pgsql/src/include/executor:
instrument.h (r1.15 -> r1.16)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/executor/instrument.h.diff?r1=1.15&r2=1.16)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-09 19:46:10 pgsql: Repair remarkably-inefficient query for dumping large object
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-09 18:41:57 pgsql: Cleanups: < * Allow a database in tablespace t1 with tables