Re: 010.pgsql.sh does not react

"pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org" <pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org> wrote:

> Alban Hertroys wrote:
> > pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org wrote:
> >> I did that and it worked. Was just wondering what's wrong with 010...
> >
> > Nothing at all ;)
>
> So you mean it is OK that 010.pgsql.sh does not work unless
> postgresql_enable="YES" is added to /etc/rc.conf?

Take some time to read the docs on the rcng system. The rulse have
changed.

--
Bill Moran

When I point out limitations of one technique as a motivation for another, I
do so in the context of specific problems; for different problems or in other
contexts, the first technique may indeed be the better choice. Useful
software has been constructed using all of the techniques presented here.

Bjarne Stroustrup, _The_C++_Programming_Language_