Re: ADD/DROP constraints

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ADD/DROP constraints
Date: 2006-06-08 21:06:55
Message-ID: 20060608210655.GA45331@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:30:22PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Or maybe I should insist that a matching constraint name be present *and* that
> the source text match? That's more of a pain to code though.

That could also break some partitioning schemes; I don't think it's a
given that parents and children have matching constraints, and afaik a
parent can have constraints that a child doesn't.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-08 21:07:56 Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-06-08 21:03:38 Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS