From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder |
Date: | 2006-06-08 19:06:01 |
Message-ID: | 20060608190601.GB19694@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >Andrew,
> >
> >>What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need
> >>for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked
> >>for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit,
> >>so I concluded that it was not generally wanted.
> >
> >Did you poll on -hackers or on -patches? A *lot* less people read
> >-patches.
>
> Yeah. true. Although, I must say that I discovered very early on in my
> pg-hacking experience that unless you read -patches too you don't really
> know what's going on ;-)
Actually reading -committers is also a must, because you then know that
something is really going on and it's not just chatter.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | A.M. | 2006-06-08 19:08:04 | Re: Ending EXPLAIN ANALYZE early (was Re: That EXPLAIN |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-08 19:01:26 | Re: Ending EXPLAIN ANALYZE early (was Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-08 19:18:36 | Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-08 18:54:35 | Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder |