From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: stopping server does not remove external_pid_file |
Date: | 2006-06-07 03:34:36 |
Message-ID: | 200606070334.k573YaE29100@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Doesn't removing the file reduce the chances of failing to start later
> > in case another postmaster already has that pid?
>
> No, because the external pidfile has zero to do with Postgres' internal
> behavior.
>
> Personally I always thought that the external pidfile was a "feature"
> we should have rejected. It can never be a particularly reliable guide
> to what PG is doing, the more especially so if the program looking at it
> isn't doing any cross-checking, as the OP seems not to be doing.
Oh, it is the "external" file, not the one we automatically create in the
/data directory.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-07 13:13:15 | Re: reindexdb command utlility |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-07 03:32:53 | Re: stopping server does not remove external_pid_file |