Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
Date: 2006-06-06 13:30:12
Message-ID: 20060606133012.GC415@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Woodward wrote:
> OK, here's my problem, I have a nature study where we have about 10 video
> cameras taking 15 frames per second.
> For each frame we make a few transactions on a PostgreSQL database.

Maybe if you grouped multiple operations on bigger transactions, the I/O
savings could be enough to buy you the ability to vacuum once in a
while. Or consider buffering somehow -- save the data elsewhere, and
have some sort of daemon to put it into the database. This would allow
to cope with the I/O increase during vacuum.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-06 13:45:41 Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2006-06-06 13:24:27 Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap