From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Broussard <cbroussard(at)liquiddatainc(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Schema Limitations ? |
Date: | 2006-05-30 18:04:49 |
Message-ID: | 20060530180449.GV59464@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Moving to -general, where this belongs.
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:13:58PM -0500, Chris Broussard wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> I have the following questions, after reading this FAQ (http://
> www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item4.4) are there statistics
> around the max number of schemas in a database, max number of tables
> In a schema, and max number of tables in a database (number that
> spans schemas) ? Are the only limitations based on disk & ram/swap ?
One hard limit you'll run into is OIDs, which max at either 2^31 or 2^32
(I can't remember offhand which it is). That would be number of schemas,
and number of total tables (there's a unique index on pg_class.oid).
Actually, you'll be limited to 2 or 4 billion tables, indexes, and
views.
In reality, I suspect you'll become very unhappy with performance well
before those numbers. Running a database with just 10000 tables can be a
bit tricky, though it's certainly doable.
> Does anybody have a rough ballpark figures of the largest install
> base on those questions?
>
> I'm curious about these stats, because I'm debating on how best to
> break up data, between schemas, physical separate databases, and the
> combination of the two.
>
> Thanks In Advanced.
>
> Chris
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | SCassidy | 2006-05-30 18:08:28 | Re: UTF-8 context of BYTEA datatype?? |
Previous Message | Rafal Pietrak | 2006-05-30 17:06:26 | Re: UTF-8 context of BYTEA datatype?? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-05-30 18:10:57 | Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-05-30 18:01:07 | Re: anoncvs still slow |