Re: error in compilation!

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: error in compilation!
Date: 2006-05-27 18:43:41
Message-ID: 200605271843.k4RIhf410067@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > dllwrap -o libplpgsql.dll --dllname libplpgsql.dll --def plpgsql.def
> > pl_gram.o pl_handler.o pl_comp.o pl_exec.o pl_funcs.o
> > -L../../../../src/backend -L../../../../src/port -lpostgres
> > Info: resolving _standard_conforming_strings by linking to
> > __imp__standard_conforming_strings (auto-import)
>
> Lack of DLLIMPORT. However, the correct fix is that plpgsql has no
> business depending on the setting of standard_conforming_strings
> here anyway (because the constructed string might be used later
> after a change to standard_conforming_strings).
>
> Guess I'd better go review Bruce's recent patch.

I am thinking it is best to always use E'' in that case. OK?

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-05-27 19:06:58 anoncvs still slow
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-05-27 18:33:16 Re: error in compilation!