Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
Date: 2006-05-26 22:23:48
Message-ID: 200605270023.49267.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> "The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or later. In
> addition, they use the inline keyword, which is not C89, but is C99
> and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is up to the user
> of these parsers to handle portability issues."

We already use inline, or handle its nonexistence, respectively.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-26 23:00:19 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-05-26 21:34:36 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing