From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: is it possible to make this faster? |
Date: | 2006-05-25 20:23:14 |
Message-ID: | 20060525202314.GA20747@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 16:07:19 -0400,
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> been doing a lot of pgsql/mysql performance testing lately, and there
> is one query that mysql does much better than pgsql...and I see it a
> lot in normal development:
>
> select a,b,max(c) from t group by a,b;
>
> t has an index on a,b,c.
>
> in my sample case with cardinality of 1000 for a, 2000 for b, and
> 300000 records in t, pgsql does a seq. scan on dev box in about a
> second (returning 2000 records).
>
> recent versions of mysql do much better, returning same set in < 20ms.
> mysql explain says it uses an index to optimize the group by somehow.
> is there a faster way to write this query?
SELECT DISTINCT ON (a, b) a, b, c FROM t ORDER BY a DESC, b DESC, c DESC;
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-05-25 20:31:40 | Re: is it possible to make this faster? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-05-25 20:07:19 | is it possible to make this faster? |