Re: ALTER SEQUENCE

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Don Y <pgsql(at)DakotaCom(dot)Net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER SEQUENCE
Date: 2006-05-22 21:37:42
Message-ID: 20060522213742.GW64371@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:08:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Don Y <pgsql(at)DakotaCom(dot)Net> writes:
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >> This is a very minor reason why you should be running the most recent
> >> 8.0.x release and not 8.0.3. A much bigger reason is that there are
> >> data-loss bugs that have been fixed.
>
> > The folks watching the Postgres releases haven't yet said
> > we need to "step forward".
>
> Are these folks actually watching, or just asleep at the wheel?
>
> 8.0.4, 8.0.5, and 8.0.6 each contain a fix for a can-bite-anyone-at-
> any-time data-loss bug. Even if you are convinced you do not care
> about any of the numerous other bugs those releases fix, I will have
> zero sympathy for you when your 8.0.3 installation eats your data
> because of one of those bugs.

Maybe we should place greater emphasis on data-loss bugs in the release
notes? Looking at the 8.0.6 notes for example, the first data loss fix
is actually the second on the list, behind some less critical
windows-only fix.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-22 21:43:41 Re: ALTER SEQUENCE
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-05-22 21:37:03 Re: [GENERAL] autovacuum "connections" are hidden