Re: Let's make CPgAN!

From: Brent Wood <b(dot)wood(at)niwa(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Let's make CPgAN!
Date: 2006-05-21 21:41:10
Message-ID: 20060522093607.Q74719@storm-user.niwa.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 20 May 2006, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> I am not sure that Postgres needs CPAN. CPAN is particularly useful for
> handling dependencies. I doubt that there will be lots of dependencies in
> Postgres add ons. So having something like the current system where you
> download and build packages from source isn't going to be improved much
> with a CPAN like system.
>

Perhaps not, but I haven't found the Postgres site pushing or linking to
projects like PostGIS or PL/R, which provide some very effective Postgres
based power.

If not CPAN-like, how about CRAN (joking :-)...

Postgres is the common denominator & foundation for several commercial &
OS packages, and highlighting these on the Postgres site would be useful
for Postgres users looking to extend Postgres functionality.

Brent Wood

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Allen 2006-05-21 23:24:58 Re: another seemingly simple encoding question
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2006-05-21 17:57:58 Re: advice on schema for multilingual text