Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-19 23:05:53
Message-ID: 200605192305.k4JN5rj26186@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> > On 5/19/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >> And with that, I am going to sit in a lawn chair and watch the bonfire.
> >
> > This is one of the finest examples of unfocused discussions I've ever
> > seen on -hackers... while surely entertaining, what a huge waste of
> > time.
>
> All discussions on mailing lists are unfocused and a waste of time to
> some degree, even the best of them because by its very nature, email is
> a time wasting tool.

Let's not forget my bad jokes. I am still chuckling at JavaZero.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-20 00:19:48 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-19 23:04:47 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-05-19 23:13:31 Re: String Similarity
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-19 23:04:47 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?