| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: table variables |
| Date: | 2006-05-18 11:13:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20060518111313.GA4359@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:16:02PM +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
> What I am trying to do is write a multi step query, where it would be
> much much much more efficient to create a temp table, so a single insert
> and then populate it with update statements.
> The problem is that you can't use a temp table in functions without
> dynamic execute statements, and those don't work for other parts of the
> code (besides the fact that they're confusing).
I'm thinking that we should just make temp tables work normally in
functions. Needs no new syntax and is what people expect anyway.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sim Zacks | 2006-05-18 11:16:02 | table variables |
| Previous Message | Ivan Zolotukhin | 2006-05-18 11:04:08 | statement_timeout and pg_dump |