Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-18 18:01:11
Message-ID: 200605181101.11547.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Marc,

> To give someone a running chance at migrating it to PostgreSQL, a 'MySQL
> compatibility module' would allow them to just plug the existing DB in,
> and then work at improving sections of the code over time ...

Have you even looked at KL's mysqlcompat?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-05-18 18:09:28 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-05-18 17:56:12 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-05-18 18:09:28 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-05-18 17:56:12 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?