| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| Date: | 2006-05-17 19:50:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20060517195059.GE26212@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:55:53PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Only if those spindles weren't all in a single RAID array and if we went
> > through the trouble of creating all the machinery so you could tell
> > PostgreSQL where all those spindles were mounted in the filesystem.
>
> I think the way you do this is simply by documenting that the admin should
> create precisely one temp area per physical spindle (or raid array).
And you still need some way to tell PostgreSQL about all of that.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-17 19:54:00 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-17 19:30:54 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-17 19:54:00 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-17 19:30:54 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |