| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | andremachado <andremachado(at)techforce(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Firebird 1.5.3 X Postgresql 8.1.3 (linux and windows) |
| Date: | 2006-05-12 19:14:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20060512191415.GT6201@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:48:52PM -0200, andremachado wrote:
> Hello,
> continuing the saga,
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-04/msg00558.php ,
> my coleague created a test database with fake data (see below).
>
> The above archived message contains the the timings of firebird and postgresql.
> The weird problem are the 2 queries that firebird executes in less than 2
> seconds and postgresql took almost half hour to complete at 100% cpu.
How about posting EXPLAIN ANALYZE for those two queries, as well as the
queries themselves?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-12 19:54:11 | Re: Firebird 1.5.3 X Postgresql 8.1.3 (linux and windows) |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-12 19:12:13 | Re: Wrong plan for subSELECT with GROUP BY |