From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Palmblad <apalmblad(at)dataunison(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Dynamically loaded C function performance |
Date: | 2006-05-11 22:05:23 |
Message-ID: | 20060511220523.GT99570@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:47:53PM -0700, Adam Palmblad wrote:
> Hi,
> We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every
> connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any
> subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms)
>
> Besides using connection pooling, are there any options to improve
> performance?
In my experience, connection startup takes a heck of a lot longer than
50ms, so why are you worrying about 50ms for the first run of a
function?
BTW, sorry, but I don't know a way to speed this up, either.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-11 22:08:02 | Re: Assistance with optimizing query - same SQL, different category_id = Seq Scan |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-11 22:04:02 | Re: slow variable against int?? |