| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... |
| Date: | 2006-05-10 21:05:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200605102105.k4AL5P015383@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Here is some work someone has done:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00258.php
See the followup for feedback. Seems it could be cleaned up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>
> I would like to implement following item from TODO list:
>
> * Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to restore them to
> defaults. Currently, if a variable is commented out, it keeps the
> previous uncommented value until a server restarted.
>
> Does anybody work on it?
>
> I performed some investigation and I found that signal handler
> (SIGHUP_handler) contents a big code and contents signal nonsafe
> functions. It should generate deadlock or damage some internal data
> structure in the standard c library. See
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_04.html for detail. By my opinion is necessary to rewrite signal handling in postmaster to avoid postgres malfunction.
>
>
> Zdenek
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-05-10 21:26:08 | Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-10 21:03:51 | Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |