| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleaning up multiply-defined-symbol warnings on OS X |
| Date: | 2006-05-09 12:14:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20060509121451.GE29652@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 10:41 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
> > Depends what you mean by signature. The structures of PGconn and
> > PGresult have changed over time, so if you you pass a PGresult
> > allocated by libpq4 to a function in libpq3, it'll crash.
>
> Symbol versioning only affects functions (and maybe variables?) but not
> structs. Nothing helps in that case.
Eh? It stops a program expecting libpq4 being linked to libpq3 for any
reason, so the above situation can't happen. You don't need to version
any structs, only the functions using them.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-09 13:18:17 | Re: Cleaning up multiply-defined-symbol warnings on OS X |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-05-09 12:00:34 | Re: Have configure complain about unknown options |