Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database!

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Andrus <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database!
Date: 2006-05-08 17:46:04
Message-ID: 20060508174604.GX99570@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 08:36:42PM +0300, Andrus wrote:
> > BTW, you might want to cut all the autovac thresholds in half; that's
> > what I typically do.
>
> I added ANALYZE command to my procedure which creates and loads data to
> postgres database
> from other DBMS. This runs only onvce after installing my application. I
> hope this is sufficient.
> If default threshold is so conservative values I expect there is some reason
> for it.

The only reason for being so conservative that I'm aware of was that it
was a best guess. Everyone I've talked to cuts the defaults down by at
least a factor of 2, sometimes even more.

BTW, these parameters are already tweaked from what we started with in
contrib/pg_autovacuum. It would allow a table to grow to 2x larger than
it should be before vacuuming, as opposed to the 40% that the current
settings allow. But even there, is there any real reason you want to
have 40% bloat? To make matters worse, those settings ensure that all
but the smallest databases will suffer runaway bloat unless you bump up
the FSM settings.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-08 17:50:13 Re: performance question (something to do w/
Previous Message Mark Lewis 2006-05-08 17:42:21 Re: performance question (something to do w/