From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support |
Date: | 2006-05-05 18:51:05 |
Message-ID: | 200605051851.k45Ip5X01239@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> > a log message that it was skipped.
>
> I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
> silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
> also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully. It would
> make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
> doesn't support CRL.
Why hard-code something if we can dynamically report it, and NetBSD 2.0
isn't that old.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-06 01:31:38 | pgsql: Issue a log message if a CRL file exists and the SSL library does |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-05 18:41:47 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2006-05-05 18:55:32 | Re: Page at a time index scan |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-05 18:41:47 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local |