From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq |
Date: | 2006-05-04 18:33:44 |
Message-ID: | 20060504183344.GL4752@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:47:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > Comparing the lists of functions exported by libpq and those declared
> > by libpq-fe.h turns up a fair number of descrepancies. Most of these
> > functions are declared by internal header files. For clarity I think we
> > should clarify the situation, either explicity declare them for
> > external users, or stop exporting them. Now that we've bumped the major
> > version of libpq, now is the perfect time to decide.
>
> Already done no? (at least on the platforms where we know how to
> restrict it)
These functions are all in the exports.txt. I was just wondering if we
wanted to cut that list down any more...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-05-04 19:02:02 | Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-04 17:38:23 | Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. |