Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios
Date: 2006-05-02 21:42:36
Message-ID: 20060502214236.GG97354@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:03:40PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> That's right, because a database's age is only decremented in
> database-wide vacuums. (Wow, who wouldn't want a person-wide vacuum if
> it did the same thing ...)

The heck with age, I'd take a person-wide vacuum if it just got rid of
all my 'dead rows'...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-02 21:46:37 Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-02 21:38:47 Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.