From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Sipe <cscotts(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Super-smack? |
Date: | 2006-05-02 20:36:44 |
Message-ID: | 20060502203643.GD97354@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:05:54AM -0500, Scott Sipe wrote:
> > So, my question is, before I do any further digging, is super-smack
> > flawed?
>
> It's sort of hard to say without looking at the source -- it certainly isn't
> a benchmark I've heard of before, and it's also sort of hard to believe a
> benchmark whose focus seems to be so thoroughly on one database (MySQL). The
> site claims (about PostgreSQL) support that "it looks like it works";
> certainly not a good start for fair benchmarking :-)
If you want a more realistic test, try dbt2:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/osdldbt
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Wasson | 2006-05-02 20:50:43 | Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-02 20:28:37 | Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core |