From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "IvoD" <gordion(at)quick(dot)cz> |
Subject: | Re: Database Selection |
Date: | 2006-04-27 01:11:25 |
Message-ID: | 200604262111.26037.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 01:46, IvoD wrote:
> My "sixth sense" tells me that PostgreSQL is better than MySQL,
> therefore for main app I prefer PostgreSQL; but I am in doubt to run
> only one db engine for two databases. But my "inner space" tells me to
> separate newsgroups system and company data system and run two
> different db engines - in light of security (although only one db
> engine looks promissing).
>
This seems pretty illogical if you follow that line of thinking out a little
further. Would you expect it to be more secure if you ran one system on
linux, apache, mod_foo and the other on bsd, lighty, and mod_bar ? Best to
through your support behind one complete system (sounds like postgresql from
previous postings) that can do the job and become an expert in making that
system secure.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-04-27 01:42:48 | Re: Database Selection |
Previous Message | Eduardo Muñoz | 2006-04-27 00:41:28 | Re: Problem with copy |