| From: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Date: | 2006-04-25 18:38:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20060425183817.GA9241@mark.mielke.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:33:38PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Sad, cause the AMD is, on a price / performance scale, twice the
> processor for the same money as the Intel.
Maybe a year or two ago. Prices are all coming down. Intel more
than AMD.
AMD still seems better - but not X2, and it depends on the workload.
X2 sounds like biggotry against Intel... :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-04-25 18:42:31 | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-04-25 18:36:56 | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |