Re: Regression error on float8

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression error on float8
Date: 2006-04-24 18:23:17
Message-ID: 20060424182317.GD2747@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If I undefine HAVE_CBRT on Linux, I get the exact same failure! So it
> seems our own version of cbrt() is broken wrt our own regression tests
> :-( Must be that nobody else (at least on i386) uses that code.

<snip>

> What do you think is best - try to adapt that version, or update our
> regression tests outputs to accept the output from our current code?

Given that our output gets very very close, perhaps we should take a
hint from the end of the MinGW version, do a single Newton iteration to
fixup those last few digits.

Adding this before the last line of our version of cbrt():

tmpres -= ( tmpres - (x/(tmpres*tmpres)) )*0.33333333333333333333;

Makes it give the same result as my system version...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-24 19:42:22 Re: 2x compile warning
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2006-04-24 18:16:04 Re: 2x compile warning