| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: new survey |
| Date: | 2006-04-21 17:27:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20060421172738.GA30328@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:23:53PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:33:10AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:38:55AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > > I'm stealing this idea from
> > > http://www.postgresqlfr.org/?q=node/641 but adding a twist:
> > >
> > > Aside from pl/pgsql, which procedural language do you use most
> > > often?
> >
> > I think SQL counts as one as our version is Turing-complete :)
>
> Yeah, but we already know you're the only one who'll vote for it, so
> it doesn't matter. :P
Not true. My second-most-used PL is PL/PerlU, followed closesly by
PL/Perl :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-21 17:37:56 | Re: Major upcoming upgrade to postgresql.org ... |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-21 17:26:09 | Re: Gborg still down |