From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mathias Laurent <e1lauren(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with SELECT FOR UPDATE NOWAIT |
Date: | 2006-04-20 22:47:38 |
Message-ID: | 20060420224737.GP49405@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I think you're confused about what actually happened...
Session 1:
decibel=# select * from a;
i
---
1
(1 row)
decibel=# begin;
BEGIN
decibel=# select * from a for update nowait;
i
---
1
(1 row)
decibel=#
Session 2:
decibel=# select * from a for update nowait;
ERROR: could not obtain lock on row in relation "a"
decibel=# select * from a for update;
...waits...
Session 1:
decibel=# rollback;
ROLLBACK
decibel=#
And immediately in session 2:
i
---
1
(1 row)
decibel=#
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:57:47AM +0000, Mathias Laurent wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Veiled I have a small problem which I have solved in a way not very clean,
> I would thus like to have your opinion. When I made with the process 1 :
>
> Select * FROM myTable WHERE num=3 FOR UPDATE NOWAIT
>
> And that I remade it with a process 2 before having do one "Commit" It
> blocked me (until there normal)
> But once that I free by doing one "Commit" with process 1 All the table
> remains to block for process 2...
> To have access it, it is necessary that I do one "Commit" with the
> processus2 !! It's very strange...
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mathias Laurent
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Mail : d?couvrez et testez la version b?ta !
> http://www.ideas.live.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-21 01:31:22 | Re: what the problem with this query |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-20 22:43:17 | Re: WAL file naming after postmaster restart |