Re: How to implement a "subordinate database"?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Kynn Jones <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to implement a "subordinate database"?
Date: 2006-04-19 15:42:39
Message-ID: 20060419154239.GA25881@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:19:50 -0400,
Kynn Jones <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I keep bumping against this situation: I have a main database A, and I want
> to implement a database B, that is distinct from A, but subordinate to it,
> meaning that it refers to data in A, but not vice versa.
>
> I don't simply want to add new tables to A to implement B, because this
> unnecessarily clutters A's schema with tables that entirely extraneous to
> it.
>
> Is there some other way?

Have you looked at schemas?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-19 16:26:11 Re: help plpgsql, cursors, fetch into
Previous Message Mauricio Mantilla 2006-04-19 15:39:16 help plpgsql, cursors, fetch into