Re: strange query filter problems

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Jonas Henriksen <jonas(dot)f(dot)henriksen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: strange query filter problems
Date: 2006-04-19 12:08:09
Message-ID: 20060419120809.GI15420@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 01:53:46PM +0200, Jonas Henriksen wrote:
> Yes, explain analyze looks like this:

Well, incorrect statistics are definitly the culprit, look:

> " -> Index Scan using sskjema_pkey on sskjema s (cost=0.00..3868.95 rows=9738 width=157) (actual time=104.465..208.185 rows=14417 loops=1)"

50% off, not bad.

> " -> Index Scan using speciesix on tskjema t (cost=0.00..6.01 rows=1 width=75) (actual time=0.140..24.594 rows=1703 loops=1)"
> " Index Cond: ((species ~>=~ 'TAGGMAKRELL'::bpchar) AND (species ~<~ 'TAGGMAKRELM'::bpchar))"
> " Filter: (species ~~ 'TAGGMAKRELL%'::text)"

Youch, 170200% percent off, which explains why it gets wildly bad
timings. Can you increase the statistics on the species column? Check
the docs for how.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dsids 2006-04-19 12:25:15 tomcat postgresql database connectivity error
Previous Message Jonas Henriksen 2006-04-19 11:53:46 Re: strange query filter problems