Re: question regarding pg_database.h and DatabaseRelationId

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: question regarding pg_database.h and DatabaseRelationId
Date: 2006-04-18 08:13:58
Message-ID: 20060418081358.GA30923@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> > Could someone explain the numbering logic in naming the relations?
>
> There is none. The numbers are presumably assigned in some
> lowest-available manner, but over the years it has become pretty
> random.

In the src/include/catalog directory there are two scripts, unused_oids
and duplicate_oids. When you need a new oid you run the unused_oids and
pick one somewhere near the rows with similar meaning. The numbers are
so all over the place that you may as well consider them random...

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-04-18 09:27:15 Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with
Previous Message energumen@buaa.edu.cn 2006-04-18 03:59:27 how can i get the binary format of timestamp?