Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
Date: 2006-04-18 03:45:24
Message-ID: 20060418034524.GA9673@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-patches

Jeff Frost wrote:

> So it looks like the original was correct all along, but with Tom's regex
> it's much cleaner. Too bad grep's regex engine doesn't support {24}.

Try grep -E ... it's even POSIX AFAIR.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-22 03:04:05 Re: COPY command documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-18 03:36:31 Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2006-04-18 07:22:52 Re: LDAP lookup of connection parameters
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-18 03:40:33 Re: schema-qualified SET CONSTRAINTS