Re: Postgresql Certifications.

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, luckysharma(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Postgresql Certifications.
Date: 2006-04-17 18:35:30
Message-ID: 20060417153402.M1096@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Robert Treat wrote:

> I might be a great thing. OTOH it could turn into a total cluster like
> the whole Microsfot/Sun Java debacle. Having some measure of control
> over what is deemed to be "postgresql-whatever" is not inherently bad.

So, what *should* happen instead of trying to say how can offer, there
should be a list maintained on *our* web site for those that are
considered "Community Approved" ... or, better, "Community Recommended"
...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2006-04-17 18:42:53 Re: Postgresql Certifications.
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-04-17 17:56:19 Re: Postgresql Certifications.